What happens to every run
The protocol and its published harness are described on antefacts.com. Invigil is the first licensed instrument to run on it.
Invigil and Antefacts share an owner
Invigil and Antefacts are separate companies with separate management, infrastructure, customer contracts and data, owned by the same parent. Invigil licenses the protocol from Antefacts on arm's length terms and pays a royalty on holdout revenue. We state this plainly because a reader of any certificate is entitled to know it, and because the alternative, that a customer or a regulator discovers it, is the failure both companies exist to prevent.
What follows from it, in the protocol rather than in policy:
- No held-out data, problems, credentials or infrastructure are shared between the companies. The Invigil problem library is never used as Antefacts test material and Antefacts items are never used by Invigil.
- Every Antefacts certificate on an Invigil run carries a published relationship field stating the common ownership.
- Where Antefacts is asked by a certification body or a procurement buyer to evaluate a system that is itself an Invigil customer, Antefacts publishes the methodology and produces no score. Invigil's customer list is disclosed to Antefacts for that purpose alone.
- The challenge owner for Antefacts evaluations sits outside the group.
The Antefacts side of this disclosure is published at antefacts.com/licensees.
A pass rate, not a verdict on the model
Invigil measures one thing: whether a model produced a machine-checkable proof of each problem it was set. We do not say a model is safe, aligned, generally intelligent or fit for a purpose. The certificate says the measurement was conducted as registered. What the number means for a deployment decision is for the customer, the board or the regulator to judge.